direkt zum Inhalt springen

direkt zum Hauptnavigationsmenü

Sie sind hier

TU Berlin

Page Content

There is no English translation for this web page.


A systematic review of operating room ventilation
Citation key Sadrizadeh.2021
Author Sadrizadeh, Sasan and Aganovic, Amar and Bogdan, Anna and Wang, Cong and Afshari, Alireza and Hartmann, Anne and Croitoru, Cristiana and Khan, Amirul and Kriegel, Martin and Lind, Merethe and Liu, Zhijian and Melikov, Arsen and Mo, Jinhan and Rotheudt, Hansjörg and Yao, Runming and Zhang, Yixian and Abouali, Omid and Langvatn, Håkon and Sköldenberg, Olof and Cao, Guangyu
Pages 102693
Year 2021
ISSN 2352-7102
DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102693
Journal Journal of Building Engineering
Volume 40
Month August
Abstract Ventilation systems are the primary way of eliminating airborne pathogenic particles in an operating room (OR). However, such systems can be complex due to factors such as different surgical instruments, diverse room sizes, various staff counts, types of clothing used, different surgical types and duration, medications, and patient conditions. OR ventilation should provide a thermally comfortable environment for the surgical staff team members while preventing the patient from suffering from any extreme hypothermia. Many technical, logistical, and ethical implications need to be considered in the early stage of designing a ventilation system for an OR. Years of research and a significant number of publications have highlighted the controversy and disagreement among infection specialists, design engineers, and ventilation experts in this context. This review article aims to provide a good understanding of OR ventilation systems in the context of air quality and infection control from existing research and provide multidimensional insights for appropriate design and operation of the OR. To this end, we have conducted a systematic review of the literature, covering 253 articles in this context. Systematic review and meta-analyses were used to map the evidence and identify research gaps in the existing clinical, practical, and engineering knowledge. The present study is categorized into six research focuses: ventilation system, thermal comfort, staff work practice and obstacles, door operation and passage, air cleaning technology, emission rate, and clothing systems. In the conclusion, we summarize the key limitations of the existing studies and insights for future research direction.
Link to publication Download Bibtex entry

Zusatzinformationen / Extras

Quick Access:

Schnellnavigation zur Seite über Nummerneingabe

Auxiliary Functions